<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GoogleOffice?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usayd.com/2005/10/04/googleoffice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usayd.com/2005/10/04/googleoffice/</link>
	<description>Peace, Justice and Freedom in Words they Flow</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean C.</title>
		<link>http://www.usayd.com/2005/10/04/googleoffice/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 04:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usayd.com/new/?p=476#comment-463</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;N.B:&lt;/b&gt; The &lt;em&gt;export contacts&lt;/em&gt; feature -- I'll hazard a guess that the exported contacts would work with KDE's Kaddressebook (also interfaced with KDE's Kontact), and GNOME/Ximian Evolution, and (not to neglect) the (common) MS Outlook. So, you could integrate your GMail contacts with the contact lists of your desktop address-book/scheduling apps.

Anyone is welcome to correct me about it, and please do, if I am wrong.

In what I can conjecture about it: It should be that GMail would export vCard files.

vCard files can be imported , even into PDA and cel-phone address books, in addition to those of the address books of the aforementioned, named software applications.

FYI: In the domains of Linux, OS-X, and  (presumably) &lt;em&gt;Qtopia(r)&lt;/em&gt;  -- regarding contacts, scheduling, and synchronization between devices:
 &lt;a href="http://pim.kde.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;KDE PIM works&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.gnome.org/projects/evolution/" rel="nofollow"&gt;GNOME Evolution homepage&lt;/a&gt;


Like as footnotes:

I've heard that KDE and GNOME can work with MS-Windows.  I'd guess it wouldn't be as snazzy as with Linux, but I've heard it could work. &lt;a href="http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Cygwin&lt;/a&gt; might be required, for such. though  I haven't checked it for this.

I suggest &lt;a href="http://ubuntu.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ubuntu&lt;/a&gt; as a first desktop Linux OS. Their LiveCD might be right cozy to use.

I use &lt;a href="http://debian.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Debian&lt;/a&gt; myself; Ubuntu is based on Debian, is updated more frequently (In the Debian release process, Debian developers take a while to ensure that the whole OS works right, but I trust that it would work fine in Ubuntu, regardless of this difference in policy)  and Ubuntu may seem (speaking of sofware and sites) to have a kinder face to it.

There is, also, &lt;a href="http://kubuntu.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;KUbuntu&lt;/a&gt;, such that is based on Ubuntu and uses KDE in preference to (perhaps in exlcusion to) GNOME.

(I  have heard that Ubuntu developers prefer GNOME in exclusion to KDE -- not that I would, honestly, but they do. Debian includes both, comprehensively. )

Of course, It is up to the user (or the admin) ultimately, to decide on the window-manager/desktop-environment and the OS

KDE is well-liked by people. The KDE window manager, specifically, has a comfortable, common appearance/look-and-feel to it. KDE seems to aways run pretty efficiently on older boxes, also. (GNOME's flashy pixmap and SVG-based themes will lag older boxes, though not all GNOME themes use pixmaps as such)

Some might still prefer GNOME (e.g. gnome-panel and Nautlius, which are some nice stand-alone applications, however, not requiring an explicit adoption of any one "desktop system")



I use Sawfish as a window-manager -- neither KDE's desktop nor Metacity (favorite of GNOME) and not Enlightement (a.k.a E), Icewm, WindowMaker, GNUStep, ... -- and some KDE apps and some GNOME apps, and maybe some  using neither  GNOME nor KDE 'libraries' and not using QT (KDE) or GTK (GNOME) as the GUI toolkit; gratefully, when you're familiar with it, it works out pretty nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>N.B:</b> The <em>export contacts</em> feature &#8212; I&#8217;ll hazard a guess that the exported contacts would work with KDE&#8217;s Kaddressebook (also interfaced with KDE&#8217;s Kontact), and GNOME/Ximian Evolution, and (not to neglect) the (common) MS Outlook. So, you could integrate your GMail contacts with the contact lists of your desktop address-book/scheduling apps.</p>
<p>Anyone is welcome to correct me about it, and please do, if I am wrong.</p>
<p>In what I can conjecture about it: It should be that GMail would export vCard files.</p>
<p>vCard files can be imported , even into PDA and cel-phone address books, in addition to those of the address books of the aforementioned, named software applications.</p>
<p>FYI: In the domains of Linux, OS-X, and  (presumably) <em>Qtopia(r)</em>  &#8212; regarding contacts, scheduling, and synchronization between devices:<br />
 <a href="http://pim.kde.org/" rel="nofollow">KDE PIM works</a><br />
<a href="http://www.gnome.org/projects/evolution/" rel="nofollow">GNOME Evolution homepage</a></p>
<p>Like as footnotes:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard that KDE and GNOME can work with MS-Windows.  I&#8217;d guess it wouldn&#8217;t be as snazzy as with Linux, but I&#8217;ve heard it could work. <a href="http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/" rel="nofollow">Cygwin</a> might be required, for such. though  I haven&#8217;t checked it for this.</p>
<p>I suggest <a href="http://ubuntu.com/" rel="nofollow">Ubuntu</a> as a first desktop Linux OS. Their LiveCD might be right cozy to use.</p>
<p>I use <a href="http://debian.org/" rel="nofollow">Debian</a> myself; Ubuntu is based on Debian, is updated more frequently (In the Debian release process, Debian developers take a while to ensure that the whole OS works right, but I trust that it would work fine in Ubuntu, regardless of this difference in policy)  and Ubuntu may seem (speaking of sofware and sites) to have a kinder face to it.</p>
<p>There is, also, <a href="http://kubuntu.com/" rel="nofollow">KUbuntu</a>, such that is based on Ubuntu and uses KDE in preference to (perhaps in exlcusion to) GNOME.</p>
<p>(I  have heard that Ubuntu developers prefer GNOME in exclusion to KDE &#8212; not that I would, honestly, but they do. Debian includes both, comprehensively. )</p>
<p>Of course, It is up to the user (or the admin) ultimately, to decide on the window-manager/desktop-environment and the OS</p>
<p>KDE is well-liked by people. The KDE window manager, specifically, has a comfortable, common appearance/look-and-feel to it. KDE seems to aways run pretty efficiently on older boxes, also. (GNOME&#8217;s flashy pixmap and SVG-based themes will lag older boxes, though not all GNOME themes use pixmaps as such)</p>
<p>Some might still prefer GNOME (e.g. gnome-panel and Nautlius, which are some nice stand-alone applications, however, not requiring an explicit adoption of any one &#8220;desktop system&#8221;)</p>
<p>I use Sawfish as a window-manager &#8212; neither KDE&#8217;s desktop nor Metacity (favorite of GNOME) and not Enlightement (a.k.a E), Icewm, WindowMaker, GNUStep, &#8230; &#8212; and some KDE apps and some GNOME apps, and maybe some  using neither  GNOME nor KDE &#8216;libraries&#8217; and not using QT (KDE) or GTK (GNOME) as the GUI toolkit; gratefully, when you&#8217;re familiar with it, it works out pretty nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usayd</title>
		<link>http://www.usayd.com/2005/10/04/googleoffice/#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>Usayd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 17:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usayd.com/new/?p=476#comment-462</guid>
		<description>Funny google problem here: &lt;a href="http://news.com.com/Taiwan+to+Google+Were+not+a+China+province/2100-1028_3-5888151.html?tag=nefd.top" rel="nofollow"&gt;Taiwan to Google: We're not a China province&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny google problem here: <a href="http://news.com.com/Taiwan+to+Google+Were+not+a+China+province/2100-1028_3-5888151.html?tag=nefd.top" rel="nofollow">Taiwan to Google: We&#8217;re not a China province</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usayd</title>
		<link>http://www.usayd.com/2005/10/04/googleoffice/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>Usayd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 17:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usayd.com/new/?p=476#comment-461</guid>
		<description>Sounds prettey damn amazing actually! :thumbup:
Thanks for the link to Writely I hadn't actually tried that out, prettey useful if you don't have word (who doesn't have word?!). It certainly looks like google are pwning after all. :alert:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds prettey damn amazing actually! :thumbup:<br />
Thanks for the link to Writely I hadn&#8217;t actually tried that out, prettey useful if you don&#8217;t have word (who doesn&#8217;t have word?!). It certainly looks like google are pwning after all. :alert:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
