<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Usayd Networks &#187; WiFi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usayd.com/category/usayd-network-news/technology-computing-news/wifi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usayd.com</link>
	<description>Design and development, ranging from dynamic websites to intricate print media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 12:15:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon WiFi Camera Released</title>
		<link>http://www.usayd.com/2005/09/04/nikon-wifi-camera-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usayd.com/2005/09/04/nikon-wifi-camera-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2005 14:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Usayd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology + Computing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiFi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usayd.com/new/?p=456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In January 2005 I actually wrote a topic concerning such an issue, 8 months down the line and the topic is brought up again. Reading back the product which was announced by Kodak was said to become availiable in June. Well everyone forgot about that one, but now Nikon has released one and it&#8217;s reported [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In January 2005 I actually <a href="http://yse-uk.com/wordpress/?p=138" target="_self">wrote a topic</a> concerning such an issue, 8 months down the line and the topic is brought up again. Reading back the product which was announced by Kodak was said to become availiable in June. Well everyone forgot about that one, but now Nikon has released one and it&#8217;s reported on Slashdot.</p>
<p> <img width="25" height="23" border="0" src="http://yse-uk.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/Wysi-Wordpress/plugins/emotions/images/ponder.gif" alt="emoticon" title="emoticon" />If you look at the title of the article i&#8217;ve quoted from, you&#8217;ll see that it says the &#8216;Worlds First Built-In WiFi Cameras&#8217;. I&#8217;ve never seen anyone with a WiFi camera, so it&#8217;d be interesting to see what happend with that Kodak one. </p>
<p>Anyways &#8211; the camera:</p>
<blockquote><p>&nbsp;Nikon is redefining the digital camera shooting experience with the announcement of two new revolutionary Wi-Fi enabled models. The Coolpix P1 and P2 are the world&#8217;s first built-in Wi-Fi-enabled (IEEE802.11b/g) digital cameras to hit the marketplace. These groundbreaking cameras allow consumers to immediately transmit images wirelessly directly to a computer or to any PictBridge-enabled printer equipped with the optional Nikon Wireless Printer Adapter (PD-10), for wireless printing.</p>
<p align="center">&nbsp;:arrow: <strong><a href="http://www.physorg.com/news6183.html" target="_self">Read More</a></strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p align="left">&nbsp;Well 8 Months ago this sounded like a very cool idea. Now it sounds like old news, but even so &#8211; the future of WiFi is creeping in. </p>
<blockquote></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usayd.com/2005/09/04/nikon-wifi-camera-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Securing WiFi on distance</title>
		<link>http://www.usayd.com/2005/08/30/securing-wifi-on-distance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usayd.com/2005/08/30/securing-wifi-on-distance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 20:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Usayd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology + Computing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiFi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usayd.com/new/?p=451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well you may have read my recent post on Cutting the cords (recommended read), well to add to the topic I read today about adding to the security to WiFi. This seems like a very efficient way too! Intel is developing a new way to secure WiFi networks. The new technology aims to locate a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well you may have read my recent post on <a target="_self" href="http://yse-uk.com/wordpress/?p=497">Cutting the cords</a> (recommended read), well to add to the topic I read today about adding to the security to WiFi. This seems like a very efficient way too!</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>  Intel is developing a new way to secure WiFi networks</strong>.  </p>
</p>
<p> The new technology aims to locate a WiFi user by timing how long it takes for packets to travel to and from a wireless access point, which could prevent users outside a house or office from accessing a WiFi network indoors. </p>
</p>
<p> Precision location technology is one of several key ideas for the next few years that Justin Rattner, Intel senior fellow and director of the company&#8217;s Corporate Technology Group, showed off during a keynote presentation on the last day of the Fall Intel Developer Forum in San Francisco Thursday.</p>
<p align="center">
<p align="center"><strong> <img src='http://www.usayd.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_arrow.gif' alt=':arrow:' class='wp-smiley' />  <a target="_self" href="http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?email&#038;NewsID=12456">Read More</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</blockquote>
<p align="left">The system is a prettey clever one, it basically means that if you go outside the designated area of the where the wireless network is supposed to run, you will be prevented from further access. Personally I can already see a couple of glitches with this. Isn&#8217;t the whole idea of WiFi that you can go as far as you might want to go via a Laptop, PDA or even desktop. Okay say that a big company wants to run their network within the building then sure it should be kept that way, but an employee might want to quickly send an email before he leaves the site. Then maybe they&#8217;d have a way of having access via a key, but isn&#8217;t that back to square one? Okay thats a bit of a prejudice judgement, read the article it explains better <img border="0" title="emoticon" alt="emoticon" src="http://yse-uk.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/Wysi-Wordpress/plugins/emotions/images/wink.gif" /> </p>
<blockquote>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usayd.com/2005/08/30/securing-wifi-on-distance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time to cut the cord?</title>
		<link>http://www.usayd.com/2005/08/19/time-to-cut-the-cord/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usayd.com/2005/08/19/time-to-cut-the-cord/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Usayd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology + Computing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiFi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usayd.com/new/?p=440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the title it isn&#8217;t very hard to work out what this is all about. Wireless is the future, as a matter of fact, wireless is the present. I currently have a WiFi network in my house at 54MB/s, connected to multiple computers, devices and what have you. As a matter of fact I think [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the title it isn&#8217;t very hard to work out what this is all about. Wireless is the future, as a matter of fact, wireless is the present. I currently have a WiFi network in my house at 54MB/s, connected to multiple computers, devices and what have you. As a matter of fact I think all of the UNN reporters have wireless networks in their own houses! I know for a fact that Hamza (11b) and Qasim (54g) do!</p>
<p>There were of course some disadvantages of the wireless connectivity, WiFi. </p>
<p>It always starts with cost, when things start off they are, naturally, expensive. This really applies to just about anything. WiFi is now not only relatively cheap &#8211; it can actually be cheaper then wires! I asked an IT teacher why they had WiFi at certain points in the school, and he simply said its cheaper then having someone come and do the wiring, not to mention more efficient for the staff! </p>
<p>Seeing as the costs have dropped, what else could be considered for your average user. Well okay, I walk into the dentist to have a filling. I&#8217;m bored in the waiting room so I pull out my pocket pc (rx3715) and guess what, it automatically connects to the wireless network and there I am surfing the net at my leisure, chatting on MSN and even if I wanted to, calling people on Skype! The issue of WiFi security is a relatively big one. There are generally three options on your basic setup: No Security, <strong>Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP)</strong> &nbsp;or <strong>Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA)</strong>&trade;. This is at least how it was when I bought my wireless router which seems like a decade ago! &nbsp;Now that WPA2 has appeared, the stadardised WEP in 1999 is now probably going to be phased out (good thing my router has 128bit WPA). Okay that probably sounds like a load of &lsquo;jargon&rsquo; or whatever, so to learn more about wireless security <a target="_self" href="http://www.wi-fi.org/OpenSection/secure.asp">click here</a>.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;Seeing as security seems to have been prettey much enhanced since the begging of WiFi, there is only one major thing left (of course there are more but yeah). So I walk into the garden on a nice sunny day chatting on Skype via my pda. All of a sudden it cuts off and the sound of birds return to my ears. Yeah, range. WiFi has a few standards, 11a was probably the first. This wasn&#8217;t so compatible with the latter; 11b and 54g (which are compatible). Basically the number stands for the transfer rate and the letter really stands for the progress of which, so the earliest being a. Okay i&#8217;m not the most advanced in the area but basically the range on these things wasn&#8217;t very good. They never specified ranges for some reason (selling!!) but since the first wireless standards things have changed and very soon new advances in the technology of wireless networking have meant that not only is the range increased incredibly, it is now another solvable solution to wireless networking. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">What is my point? Well you&#8217;ve just learnt a little about WiFi and I recommend you have a look on the <a target="_self" href="http://www.wi-fi.org/">WiFi Website</a> or <a target="_self" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wireless_networking">Wireless Networking</a> on Wikipedia.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Okay so with all these advances, there is a post on slashdot which explains:</p>
<blockquote><p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;<font color="#000000"><em>&quot;eWeek has a cool <a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1843725,00.asp">review of Xirrus&#8217; XS-3900 Wireless LAN Array</a>.  The unit consists of 16 Integrated Access Points and a wireless switch&#8230;.all in one device.  According to their website, <a href="http://www.xirrus.com/">Xirrus</a> can achieve 800+ Mbps of bandwidth and handle 1000+ users. Finally enough bandwidth for us all to cut the cord?&quot;</em></font></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;Well 800meg of Bandwidth with 1000+ users sure means that there won&#8217;t be wires for much longer, even at $12,000 that is probably a worthy purchase for a company hiring that many people&#8230;!</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;Thats all from me, learn more about WiFi from one of the links.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Update 20th August;</p>
<blockquote><p class="MsoNormal"><strong>San Francisco Looks To Wireless Future</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font /><font size="-1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">It&#8217;s no secret that the mayor of San Francisco, Gavin Newsom, wants wireless. Last year, he said of city plans to install a wireless cloud, &quot;We will not stop until every San Franciscan has access to free wireless Internet service.&quot;</font> </p>
<p> <font>    </font>
<p align="center" class="MsoNormal"><font><strong><a href="http://www.internetnews.com/wireless/article.php/3528086" target="_self">Read Article</a></strong></font></p>
<p> <font> </font></p></blockquote>
<p> <font>  </font>
<p align="left" class="MsoNormal"><font>From this we can see that not only are users having induvidual WiFi points in their own homes, it is becoming something of a service that can be accessed by anyone and soon looks to be a standard in every city! Certainly something to look forward to, I can imagine in the future there could be a tax for such things.&nbsp;</font></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usayd.com/2005/08/19/time-to-cut-the-cord/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dummy Wi-Fi hotspots can violate you</title>
		<link>http://www.usayd.com/2005/01/22/dummy-wi-fi-hotspots-can-violate-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usayd.com/2005/01/22/dummy-wi-fi-hotspots-can-violate-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Usayd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology + Computing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiFi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usayd.com/new/?p=202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Makes you wonder when you&#8217;re at Starbucks, if your connection really is safe. Attackers interfere with a connection to the legitimate network by sending a stronger signal from a base station close to the wireless client, turning the fake access point into a so-called evil twin. &#34;Evil twin hot-spots present a hidden danger for Web [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Makes you wonder when you&#8217;re at Starbucks, if your connection really is safe. Attackers interfere with a connection to the legitimate network by sending a stronger signal from a base station close to the wireless client, turning the fake access point into a so-called evil twin. &quot;Evil twin hot-spots present a hidden danger for Web users,&quot; said Phil Nobles, an academic researcher who specializes in wireless Internet and cybercrime. &quot;Because wireless networks are based on radio signals, they can be easily detected by unauthorized users tuning into the same frequency.&quot; Thanks Paul!</p></blockquote>
<p>  <a href="http://www.firingsquad.com/">Firingsquad</a> [<a href="http://www.firingsquad.com/news/newsarticle.asp?searchid=7622">article</a>] Interesting, i&#8217;ve always known there was a danger with WiFi but to be honest, there are so few &#8216;hotspots&#8217; in the UK its doubtful anyone would bother with all this hacking as of yet&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usayd.com/2005/01/22/dummy-wi-fi-hotspots-can-violate-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WiFi Cam&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://www.usayd.com/2005/01/07/wifi-cams/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usayd.com/2005/01/07/wifi-cams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2005 23:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Usayd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology + Computing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiFi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usayd.com/new/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;This week will see many &#8216;new&#8217; digicams released at CES but few will be more than cosmetic tweaks and updates on current models. However Kodak have just announced something new (for them) &#8211; a Wi-Fi enabled digital camera that enables online photo sharing and viewing without the need for a computer. It also has 256MB [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;This week will see many &#8216;new&#8217; digicams released at CES but few will be more than cosmetic tweaks and updates on current models. However Kodak have just announced something new (for them) &#8211; <a href="http://www.livingroom.org.au/photolog/reviews/kodak/kodak_easyshareone.php">a Wi-Fi enabled digital camera</a> that enables online photo sharing and viewing without the need for a computer. It also has 256MB of internal memory and stores up to 1500 images.&quot; Of course, to actually get on a wireless network, a special card is required for the camera, and the firmware has yet to support WEP, so one has to wait until a Q3 2005 update to join most authenticated networks. <img border="0" alt="Kodak's New WiFi Camera" src="http://www.livingroom.org.au/photolog/easyshare-one-tm.jpg" />  <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/06/0047212">Slashdot</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usayd.com/2005/01/07/wifi-cams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

